πŸ›οΈ Understanding Historical Sources

Double checking if sources like articles, books, websites, or other learning materials are of a credible standard is important.  Below is a checklist of things to keep in mind when viewing resources (including ones we share):

 

πŸ§ͺ Quick Checklist for Evaluating a Source

Criteria Questions to Ask 🧠 Why It Matters
Authenticity Is the source genuine and verifiable? Ensures the source is genuine and time-accurate
Author Expertise Does the author have formal training or credentials in history? Author expertise affects reliability
Bias & Objectivity Is the language neutral or emotionally charged? A biased source may omit key facts, exaggerate, or misrepresent events to support a particular agenda.
Purpose Was the source created to inform, entertain, or persuade? Purpose shapes content and bias
Corroboration Do other sources confirm the same information? Corroboration confirms facts
Context Does the source reflect the norms and events of its time? Context prevents misinterpretation
Publication Quality Is it peer-reviewed or published by a reputable academic institution? Academic review guarantees credibility


This guide can be used to evaluate historical sources using principles and tools endorsed by top U.S. universities.

 

1. Check Source Authenticity

  • What to ask:

    • Is the source original or a reproduction?

    • Is it housed in a reputable archive or collection?

  • Why it matters: Authentic sources are the bedrock of credible historical analysis.

πŸ”— Stanford University Archives πŸ”— Yale Manuscripts & Archives Guides πŸ”— Harvard Library – Evaluating Sources

 

2. Evaluate the Author’s Credentials

  • What to ask:

    • Is the author a trained historian or scholar?

    • Are they affiliated with a university or research institution?

    • Were they an eyewitness or writing retrospectively?

  • Why it matters: Expertise and proximity to events shape reliability.

πŸ”— Harvard History Department Writing Resources πŸ”— Stanford Historical Society – Source Evaluation

 

3. Understand the Purpose & Audience

  • What to ask:

    • Was the source created to inform, entertain, or persuade?

    • Is it a scholarly article, propaganda, or fiction?

  • Why it matters: The intent behind a source affects its objectivity.

πŸ”— Harvard Guide to Using Sources

 

4. Corroborate with Other Sources

  • What to ask:

    • Do other sources confirm the same facts?

    • Are there multiple perspectives on the event?

  • Why it matters: Cross-checking builds a fuller, more accurate picture.

πŸ”— Yale History Department – Research Collections πŸ”— Harvard Ask-a-Librarian History Research Guide

 

5. Contextualize the Source

  • What to ask:

    • What was happening when the source was created?

    • What cultural or political forces shaped it?

  • Why it matters: Context helps avoid misinterpretation or anachronism.

πŸ”— Stanford Primary Sources Guide πŸ”— Yale Research Guides – Subject-Specific Context

 

6. Use Peer-Reviewed & Academic Publications

  • What to ask:

    • Is the source published by a university press or peer-reviewed journal?

    • Does it cite other scholarly work?

  • Why it matters: Academic publishing ensures rigorous review and credibility.

πŸ”— Harvard Guide – Peer-Reviewed vs. Popular Sources Harvard Guide – Peer-Reviewed vs. Popular Sources πŸ”— Yale Historical Review & Research Centers Yale Historical Review & Research Centers

 

Below is a video on Resource Reliability that can give insight to validating if a source is trustworthy & a tabled summary of the concepts from the video. 

πŸ” What Is Reliability?

πŸ” What Is Reliability?

  • A source evaluation skill used to judge how trustworthy a source is

  • Reliability is graded in degrees, not absolutes:

    • Extremely reliable

    • Very reliable

    • Somewhat reliable

    • Rarely reliable

    • Not very reliable

  • Essential for ensuring the quotes you use are credible

🧠 How to Assess Reliability

🧠 How to Assess Reliability

To determine reliability, analyze the source creator's background:

  • Was the creator present at the event?

  • Does the creator have academic expertise in the topic (e.g., university professor)?

  • Has the source been fact-checked and peer-reviewed (e.g., published in an academic journal)?

⚠️ What If a Source Seems Unreliable?

⚠️ What If a Source Seems Unreliable?

  • Best option: avoid using it

  • If the source is uniquely relevant and no alternatives are available:

    • Justify its use through other evaluation methods

    • Don't solely rely on declaring it unreliable

πŸ§ͺ How to Establish Unreliability

Indicators of a potentially unreliable source:

  • Creator wasn't present at the time of the event (e.g., writing long after)

  • Creator lacks formal historical education

  • Use of highly biased language or unverified claims (e.g., personal blog)

  • Source’s purpose is primarily to entertain rather than inform (e.g., dramatic retellings)

 

πŸ“š Examples

1. Richard III & Shakespeare

  • Shakespeare’s play written 100+ years after Richard’s death

  • Purpose: entertain, not to document historical truth

  • Conclusion: Shakespeare is a very unreliable source for Richard III’s life

2. Roman Army & Adrian Goldsworthy

  • Goldsworthy holds a PhD in Ancient History from Oxford

  • Specialized in Roman military history (100 BC – AD 200)

  • Authored multiple academic books; taught globally

  • Conclusion: Goldsworthy is an extremely reliable source on Roman military history

Stories told in pixels

We pride ourselves on our adaptability and commitment to excellence in every aspect of our service. Explore what we have to offer and how we can contribute to your success.

Promotional offer

Don't miss out on the chance to save while enjoying the quality and service you love. Keep an eye on this space for the latest updates and grab these amazing deals while they last!